Fall 2022 First Year Seminar

The End(s) of the Body

Professor Patrick Frierson

Office Hours in Olin 193: Mondays and Wednesdays 9am-11am

Class Meets MWF 11-11:50 Olin 184[1]

Come see me! 

I’m in my office (Olin East 193) and happy to meet with students on Monday and Wednesdays from 9-11am.  We can talk about questions related to class, but you don’t need a specific reason to come.  If you can’t make these times, send me an email and we can make an appointment for another time.  I’m also happy to meet with students over zoom who prefer to meet in that format.  I will generally hang out in zoom office hours Monday evenings from 9-10 PM at https://whitman.zoom.us/j/92189368747, but if you want to be sure I’m going to be there, shoot me an email before dropping in.

Course Description

This seminar introduces students to the liberal arts through an interdisciplinary discussion of th­­e locus of a moving, experiencing self as the foundation of cognition and being in the world — the body. The course includes interdisciplinary plenaries that explore both text and movement in the form of somatic/dance practices. Both textual analysis and movement investigate the body's relationship to power as both shaped by, and resisted through, culture, race, gender, and dis/ability. Through exploration of the body historically and politically at both the local and global level, the course begins with and continually returns to the most basic question: What is the body?  How do the boundaries of the body exist in intersection with the environment? How is the body a site of memory, trauma, or resistance?  Other Instructors in your pod are Xiaobo Yuan (Religion/Anthropology) and Elyse Semerdjian (History).  I offer many thanks to both of these colleagues for material that has made its way into this syllabus and this course.

 

Required Materials

A good notebook for keeping a personal journal.  This notebook should have at least 100 pages.

Rene Descartes, Selected Philosophical Writings, trans. Cottingham, Stoothoff, and Murdoch, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, ISBN: 978-05213-5812-5

Bessel van der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score, New York: Penguin Publishing, 2014, ISBN: 978-0-1431-2774-1

Alva Noë, Out of Our Heads, New York: Hill and Wang, 2009, ISBN: 978-0-8090-1648-8.

Claudia Rankine, Citizen: An American Lyric, Minneapolis: Graywolf Press, 2014, ISBN: 978-1-55597-690-3.

Toni Morrison, Beloved, New York: Vintage, 1987, ISBN: 978-14000-3341-6

 

Course Goals

If you put forth an effort in this course, by the end of the semester you should be able to:

o   Demonstrate improved ability to ask increasingly focused and complex questions.

o   Demonstrate improved ability to read inquisitively and generously, with attention to detail and nuance.

o   Demonstrate improved ability to formulate productive questions that guide exploration of a complex text (broadly construed)

o   Demonstrate improved ability to use writing and discussion as means to discover and reconsider ideas.

o   Demonstrate improved ability to understand how a writer’s overt purposes and readers’ expectations influence the structure and style of writing.

o   Demonstrate an improved sense of your own body and what it can do

o   Demonstrate improved understanding of various theories about the body and of how attention to the body can enrich engagement with art, literature, philosophy, and other fields.

 

Course Requirements

Participation

Meaningful classroom participation is essential for the seminar format to work properly.  We are going to have a variety of different classes with different formats.  The majority of class sessions will focus around discussion of a text.  For these classes, your task is to carefully read the text before each class with the ability to select themes that characterized that reading.  Once during the semester, you will do a presentation for one of these classes, and for every class for which there is a reading, you should follow the “How do I prepare for class?” guidelines below.  Other classes involve participation in various specific forms of embodied practice, often with guest speakers/guides.  You are expected to fully participate in the activities of those classes unless you have specific accommodations that preclude such participation, and to show respect to your guides and your classmates.  In some cases, we will be putting ourselves in unfamiliar bodily situations, which can feel very vulnerable, so we must take care of each other during these sessions.

For every class session, you are expected to participate in ways that are responsible, respectful, and fully present.  With rare exceptions, I will ask you to put away all electronic devices when you enter the classroom and to pay attention to yourself, your classmates, and me.  You must show others respect, and you should invite anyone in the class—including me—to reflect on ways that we might be intentionally or unintentionally creating a climate of disrespect.  This class will work best when we are all able to be vulnerable and even uncomfortable around one another.  For related reasons, I ask that you keep our classroom activities confidential unless you have express permission to share what you experience in class. 

            Class attendance is mandatory.  If you have more than four absences, whether or not these are excused absences, you will suffer a one grade notch decrease in your final grade for each additional absence (i.e., if you had six absences and otherwise would have gotten an A-, you will get a B).  This means that you should save absences for genuine emergencies.  If you miss more than 9 (nine) class sessions, you cannot pass the class.

 

How Do I Prepare for Class?  How to Prepare Discussion Notes (modified from Elyse S.)

Reading primary texts can be challenging.  Original texts written within different historical periods, languages, and genres are often dense and full of layered arguments that one needs to pick through to map the author’s ideas.  If you cultivate these key reading habits, they will help you prepare for an engaging discussion in your classed through graduation.  To improve close reading habits and encourage more oral communication in class, I require that students come to class with preparatory notes.  These can be written in the texts themselves and/or written on a sheet of paper (typed or handwritten), but they should be present in physical (non-electronic) form with you in class, and they should be prepared in such a way that you are ready to read/show them to others in class.  The notes should include the following:

*A key passage from the text (written out or clearly marked).

*The key argument(s) offered by the author, written in your own words.  If it is difficult to locate a single argument, pick out two or three main themes from the writing.

*A prepared question from the text that you are willing to share with others.

* Drawings or diagrams that help you understand the arguments and readings can also be included but cannot substitute for questions and passages extracted from the reading.

I do not want to implement a requirement that you hand in your notes, but I have in the past when classes were not demonstrating preparedness. 

I will adjust your final grade based on your participation in class, including your completion of careful preparation for discussion.  Excellent participation can boost your final grade by up to a full grade notch (from B+ to A-, for example).  Lack of participation can lower it by a notch.  Poor participation (disruptive or disrespectful) can lower it by a full grade point (from A to B). 

In addition, there are two specific participation-related requirements in this course which will count as a specific percentage of your overall grade:

1.  Presentations (5% each, 10% of total grade):

Discussion Leadership Presentation.  In order to encourage participation and collective ownership of our class, students will pair up with a partner once for a 10-minute presentation during the first half (ish) of the semester.  In the presentation, you will lay out a theme from the reading and generate questions that will guide the discussion.  Students are also welcome to use that time to make a meaningful connection between texts to synthesize the course material.  The grade for this presentation will be calculated into the final participation grade.  A great presentation should model close, analytical reading and inquiry for our class.  A presentation should work to pose analytical questions that bring greater understanding to the content of the reading, yet questions can also include provocations that spark a lively debate about the reading.   Your presentation should do the following (assignment borrowed from Elyse):

1. Identify the overall argument(s) in the reading.  If there is no clear argument(s), look for major themes or questions posed in the reading.

 

2. Identify the 3 (+) most important points of the reading.

 

3. Identify at least three crucial passages in the readings that are most explanatory and provide real insight into the central themes, as well as those that most puzzle you. Unresolved questions are encouraged.

 

4.  Optional:  Make a meaningful connection with any outside material (music, art, culture, science, politics) that further expands or illustrates the arguments within the presentation.

 

Consider this an invitation to get creative and embrace the ways that our texts speak to you and your world!

If you have any questions about your presentation, please consult me at any time or just drop by office hours.

Passion Project Presentation. Your second presentation should be no more than 10 minutes in length, and many be on any topic related to the body, embodiment, or the texts that we read in this class.  This, again, is a chance to be creative and to introduce the class to material we might not otherwise engage with.  You are free to assign up to 15 pages of reading or up to 20 minutes of viewing for your classmates in anticipation of the presentation, but you are not required to do so.  You may present in whatever format you find most suitable for your topic.  If you have any questions about your presentation, please consult me at any time or just drop by office hours.

 

2. Peer Feedback Discussion Days (10% of total grade):  Four times during the semester (September 23 and October 3, 12, and 19), we will have peer feedback discussion days.  These are days where some portion of the class will focus on quietly attending to the rest of the class while we discuss the material for the day.  On these days, you will be assigned to be either a “discussant,” a “listener,” or an “observer.” 

If you are a discussant, you should simply discuss the material as you normally would in class. 

If you are a listener, you should not speak during the discussion but instead attentively listen to your peers.  Pay close attention both to what they are saying and how they are saying it.  Take notes (by hand).  After class, you should send an email to each participant in the discussion (including me), and you should cc me on your comments to your classmates.  In your email, you should tell them something substantive that you learned from them through their comments or you should make a constructive comment about how they make their comments.  With your written comments to your classmates, you should set a high priority on respectful attention.  Do not belittle or shame classmates with your comments to them.  At the same time, as much as possible, you should try to help them improve as participants in respectful discussion.

            If you are an “observer,” you should focus on the body language of the discussants (including me).  What do you learn or sense about their attitudes from their body language, how they look at others and how others look at them, and so on.  For each classmate (including me, Patrick), write down something that you notice about their embodied presence in the class on that day, either in general or in a particular episode of the class.  Share at least one constructive comment with each discussant (and cc me, as above).  Set a high priority on respectful attention.  Do not belittle or shame classmates.  At the same time, as much as possible, try to help them improve as embodied participants in respectful discussion.

 

Written Work

This course has several important writing-related goals, most of which are best served through less formal styles of writing.  At the same time, however, the course will prepare you for college-level writing through more formal assignments.  Note that even though these assignments are typically worth only 10% of your grade, you must complete all of them in order to pass the class, and to complete an assignment, you must (among other things) meet the minimum word count (if there is one for that assignment).

Journal (10% of total grade).  Each of you should have a physical (non-electronic) notebook or journal in which you can hand-write reflections over the course of the semester.  You should bring this notebook with you to class.  During class, as you hear or experience things that you want to reflect on later, you should jot them down in your notebook.  As you encounter something particularly provocative or interesting in the readings, you should jot it down.  You can, if you choose, keep your reading notes (see above) in your journal.  In addition to those items, you should spend at least 10 minutes a day, for at least four days a week, writing and reflecting on the themes of this course.  You should do this writing with a hand-writing implement (pen or pencil) in a notebook.  This exercise is both an intellectual practice of using writing as means to discover and reconsider ideas and also an embodied practice where you are exercising manual and bodily skills and remaining attentive to the embodied experience of writing in a journal.  I will periodically check on these journals, and may collect them just to make sure you are keeping up with them.  I will not read them, and if there are specific pages you do not want me to read, you may staple those together when you turn in the journal.  This is writing you are doing for you.  If you keep up with the journals regularly, you will get an A for this part of your grade.

Daily Written Prep Work (10%):  Over the course of the semester, there will be periodic written assignments due before class.  I will check to make sure you have completed these assignments in good faith.  If you have, you will get an A for this part of your grade.  If you have not, this part of your grade will drop by a grade point (from A to B) for each missed assignment.

Journal Expansion Papers (5% each, 10% total):  Twice during the semester, you will be expected to write a 300-500 word short reflection based on something that you wrote in your journal.  This should start with a quotation from your journal and then expand the insight that you had in that passage through further reflection, including at least one substantive engagement with a text we read after you wrote that entry in your journal.  Each of these papers will include a specific “grammar goal” that you have to meet in order to pass the assignment.  For the first one, you need to ensure that your paper (excluding the direct quotation from your journal) does not have any run-on sentences in it.  The grammar goal for the second paper will be set based on your other written work.  These expansion papers will be graded as check, check-plus, or check-minus.  The first is due September 21.  The second is due whenever you choose, but no later than the last day of class.

Short Assigned Papers (SAPs) (40% total, 10% each):  Over the course of the semester, there will be four specific short papers to encourage engagement with the course material.  These papers are to be written with appropriate citations of text (see Diana Hacker, A Pocket Style Manual) and clearly constructed.  Assignments are indicators of the students’ proficiency in understanding and critically engaging the course texts.  I will “grade” papers with a score from 1-10.  For my expectations in terms of your writing, and an interpretation of the scores on papers, see my grading criteria.  SAPs are listed on the timeline below.  There are two required SAP revisions, one on SAP #1, and one on the SAP of your choice.  These revisions must be completed in order to pass your SAPs.  You are also allowed to revise any SAPs as many times as you choose until the last day of class.  The final grade on the SAP will be the average of the grade on your first version and the highest grade that a draft receives on that assignment.[2]   The first drafts are due on September 12, October 5, October 24, and November 7.

Final Paper/Project (10%):  At the end of the semester, you must write a final paper of your choosing that deals with Beloved in a substantive way.  If you choose to do an additional final project (demonstrating an embodied practice, creating a video or work of art), then the final paper must be at least 600 words.  Otherwise, the final paper must be at least 1500 words.  As with the SAPs, these papers are to be written with appropriate citations of text, clearly constructed, and meet my grading criteria.

Deadlines:  Work must be turned in on time.  If you turn in work late, it will be marked as not completed, though I will give you feedback on the work.  You may “rewrite” work that was turned in late, but the initial grade for that work will be an F, so the highest you can get through revision is a C.  Once during the semester, you may take a 48-hour extension on a paper with no penalty.  The purpose of this extension is to deal with genuine emergencies (sudden illness, breakdowns, etc.), so it for such emergencies.  With extremely rare exceptions, I will not give other extensions.

 

Overall Grade

Your final grade will be based on your two presentations (10%), your peer feedback (10%), your journal (10%), daily written prep work (10%), journal expansion papers (10%), four short assigned papers (10% each, 40% total), and your final paper on Beloved (10%).  I will adjust this grade upwards or downwards based on the overall quality of your participation in and preparation for class.  Disengagement with class or disrespect for your peers can significantly lower your final grade.

 

Course Timeline

Note: I am not posting assignments to Canvas.  You will need to check this syllabus regularly to ensure that you are doing the required work for the day.  You should also look ahead to make sure you are getting started on larger assignments that will not be due for a while.

 

 

Reading to complete before class

Writing to complete before class

What to expect in class

Discussion Leader

Aug 31

Descartes, Meditation 1 (we’ll read this together in class), pp. 76-79

 

Cartesian Meditation, Discussion

 

Sept. 2

Descartes, Discourse 1-4, pp. 20-40.

Daily Written Prep Work: Write an email to a friend in which you share at least one thing from Descartes that you think they would find cool, and explain why you think they would find it cool.  If possible, make it personal.  (You should cc: frierspr@whitman.edu on this email.)

Class discussion of Descartes.

Bonus: Friday night movie.  Let’s watch the Matrix together.  (If a small group and relatively tame COVID-situation, we can do this at my house.  Otherwise, we can do it in a large space on campus, and/or just all on our own with a post-movie zoom hangout.)

 

Sept. 5

Descartes, Meditations 1-4 (focus on meditation 2), pp. 73-105.

Daily Written Prep Work: Do a thorough job with your discussion notes (see green box above).  Focus on Meditation Two and then one of the other Meditations (of your choice). 

In addition, email me at least one question about the reading, at least one hour before class starts.

Short lecture and discussion of Descartes’s Meditations, focused on Meditation 2.

 

Sept. 7

Descartes (Discourse 5-6), pp. 40-56 and handout.

Daily Written Prep Work: Write a pre-lab report.  (Click link for details.)

 

 

Sept. 9

Descartes, heart dissection lab, Discourse 5 (same handout).

Daily Written Prep Work: Revise your pre-lab report.

Cow Heart Dissection (meet in the Science Building, room 206)

 

Sept. 12

Descartes Meditation 6 (preread Passions), and correspondence with Elizabeth, pp. 110-122, handout.

SAP #1: Lab Report (10% of final grade)

Discussion of Meditation 6 and Cartesian “dualism”

 

Sept. 14

Descartes (Meditation 6 and Passions), pp. 110-122, 218-238.

No writing for today.  Be sure you are keeping up with your journals.

Yoga Workshop (meet in the open space behind Reid Campus Center)

 

Sept. 16

Descartes, Passions of Soul, pp. 218-238.

Shigehisa Kuriyama, “Preface” and “Muscularity and Identity”

Daily Written Prep Work: Revise the “Introduction” and “Discussion” sections of your lab report.  Bring these sections to class.

Discuss Greek, Chinese, and Cartesian approaches to medicine.

Discuss Cartesian Lab Reports

 

Sept. 19

Descartes, review.

SAP #1, Substantive Revision Due.

Frierson Plenary: “Two Cartesian Dualisms”

 

Sept. 21

Van Der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score, pp. 1-50.

Be sure you are keeping up with your journals.  By midnight on Sept. 21, submit your first Journal Expansion Paper (300-500 words based on a journal entry, with no run-on sentences).

Class Shuffle

 

Sept. 23

Van Der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score, pp. 1-104, especially chapters 2, 4, and 5.

Daily Written Prep Work:  List 10 ways van der Kolk draws (either explicitly or implicitly) on Descartes.  List 10 ways he goes beyond Descartes.

Introduction to van der Kolk, discussion.

Class Observation Day

 

Sept 26

Van Der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score, pp. 186-231.

Daily Written Prep Work:  Write a provisional thesis about how van der Kolk makes use of and goes beyond Descartes, a conjecture that could be worth writing a short paper about.

Discussion of van der Kolk.

Thesis design workshop.

 

Sept. 28

Van Der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score, pp. 250-278.

Be sure you are keeping up with your journals.

 

 

Sept. 30

Van Der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score, pp. 311-348.

Be sure you are keeping up with your journals.  Definitely write an entry reflecting on class today.

Embodied Therapy with Nick Fair Duran

 

Oct. 3

Van Der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score, pp. 311-358.

Be sure you are keeping up with your journals, and with your preparation for class.  I’ll likely call on some of you today to read from your discussion notes.

Class Observation Day

 

Oct. 5

Van der Kolk review

SAP #2.  Write a short paper (800-1200 words) in which you draw from an embodied practice—either one you have direct experience with or one discussed by van der Kolk—in order to either extend or critique an important claim from Descartes.  Even if you are writing from your own experience, your paper should engage in a substantive way with van der Kolk.

 

 

Oct. 7 -- Break

 

 

 

 

Oct. 10

Alva Noë, Out of Our Heads, pp. 1-46

Daily Written Prep Work:  Take a particular discussion from van der Kolk and revise it in the light of Noë.  Ideally, suggest a specific revision to his therapeutic practice based on a less Cartesian approach to the mind.  Alternatively, provide a different—Noëish—way of interpreting a result that van der Kolk presented.

Yoga Workshop

(meet in the open space behind Reid Campus Center)

 

 

 

 

 

Oct. 12

Alva Noë, Out of Our Heads, pp. 47-65

Daily Written Prep Work:  Take a particular discussion from van der Kolk and use it to critique a claim that Noë makes.

Discussion of Noë (and van der Kolk, and Descartes)

Class Observation Day

 

Oct. 14

Alva Noë, Out of Our Heads, pp. 97-128

Be sure you are keeping up with your journals, and with your preparation for class.  I’ll likely call on some of you today to read from your discussion notes.

 

 

Oct. 17

Alva Noë, Out of Our Heads, pp. 149-81

Daily Written Prep Work:  Follow the source.  Choose a source that Noë cites in his book.  Find at least two other books or articles that cite that source.  Give citation information for both of them and then use at least one of them to either further develop a point that Noë makes or criticize a point that he makes.

Library Day!!

 

Oct. 19

Alva Noë, Out of Our Heads, pp. 181-86

 

Class Observation Day

 

Oct. 21

Alva Noë, review.

Watch: Aimee Mullins, “It’s Not Fair Having 12 Pairs of Legs”

Daily Written Prep Work:  Revise and Repeat. Take a particular discussion from van der Kolk and revise it in the light of Noë.  Ideally, suggest a specific revision to his therapeutic practice based on a less Cartesian approach to the mind.  Alternatively, provide a different—Noë-ish—way of interpreting a result that van der Kolk presented.

Virtual Reality Lab (if I can pull it off)

 

Oct. 24

Terrence Turner, “The Social Skin,” Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2:2 (Fall 2012), pp. 486-504.

SAP #3.  Write a short paper (1000-1500 words) on Descartes, van der Kolk, and Noë.  In this paper, you should formulate a specific thesis that in some way relates to either how van der Kolk’s work disproves some important claim of Noë, or how that work might be improved through incorporating some important insight from Noë.

 

 

Oct. 26

Judith Butler, Gender Trouble, Preface to 1999 edition (vii-xxviii) and pp. 1-10, 175-6, 186-8, 202-3

Optional but recommended: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzWWwQDUPPM

Daily Written Prep Work:  Bring Butler into conversation with either Noë or van der Kolk.  Explain one specific way in which the work of one supports the other and/or calls the other’s into question. Put this in terms of a question addressed to one author, based on your reading of the other.  (So, for instance, you might say, “Doctor van der Kolk, I really appreciated your work on blah-blah.  Having recently read Judith Butler’s work, I was struck by their claim that blah-blah.  It seems like your own work is susceptible to Butler’s charge that ___.  Do you think it’s possible to ____ without ____?”)

 

 

Oct. 28

Butler, ibid.

The Examined Life, with Judith Butler and Sunaura Taylor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_N84BffPcM

 

Embodied Pratice TBD

 

Oct. 31

Read Claudia Rankine, Citizen, pp. 1-55.

(After class, Watch Film: “Get Out”)

 

Daily Written Prep Work:  Van der Kolk and Rankine both claim that “the body has memory” (Rankine, p. 28).  Spend at least 150 words writing about what makes Rankine’s articulation and defense of that claim more or less impactful than van der Kolk’s.  Use at least one specific quotation from each text. 

 

 

Nov. 2

Rankine, Citizen, 81-136

Daily Written Prep Work: Choose one page from Citizen.  Make 10 observations about that page.

 

 

Nov. 4

Rankine, Citizen, pp. 137-162.

Take the Race IAT at Project Implicit and write some reflections about your results.  You may turn these in or just send me an email saying that you did them.

Embodied Practice TBD

 

Nov. 7

 

SAP #4.  Write an essay of at least 300 words that clearly expresses some important aspect of your experience making your way through the world in your body.  Then compose a “lyric” that expresses your embodied presence in the world and that shows the limitations of your “clear” essay.

Yuan Plenary: Title TBD

 

 

Nov. 9

 

 

Class Shuffle

 

Nov. 11

Passion Project Presentations

Daily Written Prep Work: Based on the titles of the presentations, write up at least one question for each presenter.

Passion Projects: Luke,

 

Nov. 14

Passion Project Presentations

Daily Written Prep Work: Based on the titles of the presentations, write up at least one question for each presenter.  Also write up at least one thing that you learned from the previous presentations and that you hope to use in your final paper.

Passion Projects: Liv, Maddy,

 

Nov. 16

Passion Project Presentations

Daily Written Prep Work: Based on the titles of the presentations, write up at least one question for each presenter.  Also write up at least one thing that you learned from the previous presentations and that you hope to use in your final paper.

Passion Projects: Izzie,

 

Nov. 18

Toni Morrison, Beloved, Part I, pp. 1-59

Write up a question that was provoked by the presentations and that you hope you can explore in Beloved.  Link that question to one or more specific presentations.

SAP Revision: Submit a revision of one of your previous SAPs (other than SAP #1).  You are required to submit a revision of at least one SAP other than SAP #1.

Something really fun…

 

Thanksgiving Break

 

 

 

 

Nov. 28

Toni Morrison, Beloved, Part I, pp. 1-124 

 

 

 

Nov. 30

Toni Morrison, Beloved, Part I, pp. 125-195

 

 

Dec. 2

Toni Morrison, Beloved, Part II, pp. 197-277

 

Embodied practice, choose what we need at this point in semester.

 

Dec. 5

Toni Morrison, Beloved, Part III, pp. 279-324

 

Thesis workshop for final paper/project.

 

Dec. 7

Toni Morrison, Beloved, review.

 

Semerdian Plenary: “Reading Beloved Through Fleshy and Ghostly Bodies,” Kimball Auditorium 

 

Dec. 9

Course review

 

 

Dec. 13

Final Exam Time

9-11 am

We will not have a final exam in this class.  Instead, we will meet during our final exam period to share final projects.

In addition to sharing final projects, we may have some form of embodied practice during our exam period.

 

 



[1] Image modified from a work by Mina Nishimura, available at https://www.minanishimuradance.com/ (accessed 8-12-2022)

[2] (So, if you turn in an SAP and get a C+, and then revise it and get a B-, and then do a major revision and get an A-, and then take a big risk with a complete rewrite and get a B-, you’ll end up with a B (the average of C+ and A-) for that assignment.  I may also give you a bit of a boost for the risky rewrite, even though it didn’t pan out.)