Home| Writing Courses| Advice| Teaching Observations| Collection of Thoughts| Sentence Collection|
Etc,. etc., etc.| English Department | Whitman College | Comments|

Ellipses


Most of the time, just use three dots (with spaces in between the dots) to signal stuff you've left out of quotations or empty spaces you want to mark. If you want to know more, here are the rules (as I understand them . . . .]

1. Here are four sentences. (The "127" refers to a page number in an in-text documentation format.) What's the difference in meaning? (Look at the spaces between the dots):

  1. According to Jones, "Thompson was a big eater" (127).
  2. According to Jones, "Thompson was a big eater . . ." (127).
  3. According to Jones, Jack Thompson was "a big eater" (127).
  4. According to Jones, "Thompson was a big eater. . . ."

Here, sentence (a) suggests that the sentence ends after "eater."

Sentence (b) suggests that the sentence continues after "eater." (Maybe the original sentence reads, "Everyone knew Thompson was a big eater, a healthy fellow who liked his chicken wings."]

Sentence (c) contains some kind of fragment cut from a longer sentence. (Since it's obvious the the quoted piece is some kind of fragment, you don't need to use ellipses to signal that something is missing.)

In sentence (d), you signal that your quotation continues after "eater" even though "Thompson was a big eater" looks like a complete sentence. (The original may have been something like "Thompson was a big eater, a big Big eater." If you cut off the last part of that sentence, you have to use a fourth dot snugged right up against the word "eater" to signal the final period of the sentence. After that, you use three dots to signal missing information.)

2. What's the difference between these two sentences:

  1. Bobs says, "Big woozers wuzzled . . . [and] woozled, too."
  2. Bobs says, "Big woozers wuzzled. . . . [and] woozled, too."

Sentence (a) suggests that something was taken out between "wuzzled" and "woozled." That something could have been extra words in the sentence--for instance, the whole sentence could have read: "Big woozers wuzzled happily, sympathetically, and strongly while all the time they woozled, too.") Or there might have been extra words at the end of one sentence and the beginning of the next sentence. (The whole passage could have been two sentences: "Big woozers wuzzled happily. Not surprisingly, they woozled, too.")

Sentence (b) suggests that the first sentence ends after "wuzzled" and one or more sentences were removed before the final "They woozled, too." [The sentences in the original might have read, "Big woozers wuzzled. While they wuzzled, they did they did the obvious. They woozled, too.")

3. If you omit a whole line of poetry or a whole paragraph, use a whole line of ellipses:

     Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary,
     Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore--
     While I nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping.
     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
     "`Tis some visitor," I muttered, "tapping at my chamber door--
     Only this and nothing more."




Got questions?
Writing Center Homepage