Schook, D. M, M. D. Collins, W. E. Jensen, P. J. Williams, N. E. Bader, and T. H. Parker 2008. Geographic patterns of song similarity in the Dickcissel (Spiza americana). Auk. 125. 953-964.
Parker, T. H., and J. D. Ligon. 2007. Multiple aspects of condition influence a heritable sexual trait: a synthesis of the evidence for capture of genetic variance in red junglefowl. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 92: 651-660.
Parker, T. H. and H. Tillin. 2006 Male blue tits Parus caeruleus choose early-leafing tree species during spring dawn chorus. Bird Study. 53: 253-257.
Parker, T. H. , C. D. Becker, B. K. Sandercock, and A. E. Agreda. 2006. Apparent survival estimates from five species of tropical birds in an endangered forest habitat in western Ecuador. Biotropica. 38: 764-769.
Parker, T. H. , I. Barr, and S.C. Griffith. 2006. The blue tit’s song is an inconsistent signal of male condition. Behavioral Ecology. 17: 1029-1040.
Kosciuch, K. L. T. H. Parker, and B. K. Sandercock. 2006. Nest desertion by a cowbird host: an antiparasite behavior or a response to egg loss? Behavioral Ecology. 17: 917-924.
Parker, T. H. , D. Thompson, J. D. Ligon, B. Schneider, and F. Byrn. 2006. Does red junglefowl comb size predict sperm swimming speed and motility? Ethology, Ecology, and Evolution 18: 53-60.
Griffith, S. C., T. H. Parker, and V. A. Olson. 2006 . Melanin- versus carotenoid-based sexual signals: is the difference really so black and red? Animal Behaviour 71: 749-763.
Parker,T. H.,J. C. Hagelin, and J. D. Ligon. 2005. Do female Callipepla quail respond to male plumage ornaments? Animal Behaviour 70:e7-e9.
Parker, T. H. 2005. No evidence for adaptive differential sex allocation in red junglefowl. Auk122: 1161-1168.
Parker, T. H. and D. Garant. 2005. Quantitative genetics of ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus ). Heredity 95: 401-407.
Parker, T. H. , B. M. Stansberry, C. D. Becker, and P. S. Gipson. 2005. Edge and area effects on the occurrence of migrant forest songbirds. Conservation Biology 19: 1157-1167.
Parker, T. H. and D. Garant. 2004. Quantitative genetics of sexually dimorphic traits and capture of genetic variance by a sexually-selected condition-dependent ornament in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 1277-1285.
Parker, T. H. , B. M. Stansberry, C. D. Becker, and P. S. Gipson. 2003. Do melanin or carotenoid pigmented plumage ornaments signal condition and predict pairing success in the Kentucky Warbler? Condor 105: 663-671.
Parker, T. H. 2003. Genetic benefits of mate choice separated from differential maternal investment . Evolution 57: 2157-2165.
Parker, T. H. and J. D. Ligon. 2003. Female mating preferences in red junglefowl: a meta-analysis. Ethology, Ecology, and Evolution 15: 63-72.
Parker , T. H and J. D. Ligon. 2002. Dominant male red junglefowl test the dominance status of other males. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 53:20-24.
Parker, T. H. , R. Knapp, and J. A. Rosenfield. 2002. Social mediation of sexually selected ornamentation and steroid hormone levels in male junglefowl. Animal Behaviour 64:291-298.
Parker, T. H. 2002. Maternal condition, reproductive investment, and offspring sex ratio in captive red junglefowl (Gallus gallus ) Auk 119: 840-845. See Parker 2005 Auk (above) for corrected analyses
Parody, J. M. and T. H. Parker. 2002. Biogeographic variation in nest placement: a case study with conservation implications. Diversity and Distributions 8:11-20.
Parker, T. H. 1999. Responses of Bell’s Vireos to brood parasitism by the Brown-headed Cowbird in Kansas. Wilson Bulletin 111: 499-504.