Welcome to English 110C

Language and Writing

 

Fall 2009

 


Announcements:

 

 


 

 

About this webpage

Once the term has started, you will be able to follow hotlinks (white, bold, and underlined) for course material and related resources.

About English 110C

English 110C meets Mondays, Tuesdays, and Thursdays, 11-11:50 am, in Olin 220.

 

English 110C – also known as Language and Writing – provides an entry into college-level writing and academic discourse.   The course encourages students to examine writing closely, to figure out what makes a piece of writing effective (or not) and how different aspects of writing work together (or don’t). We’ll address conventions, rules, and preferences that masquerade as rules.  By making choices about an array of interrelated tools, students can devise a writing style that is both effective in an academic setting and comfortably individual.

 

Writing in English 110C

Students in English 110C write – a lot. Here are the essays written the evening of the first class. After the writers approve the titles given to their essays or offer new ones, a final set, including comments, will be posted.

 

Here are the complete Guidelines – including presentation, values, and grading advice – for writing essays in English 110B. There is also a code to deciphering the line notes in essays that have been graded and returned, and some notes about grading for longer essays. Although we will discuss and practice specific revising techniques throughout the term, here are some initial thoughts about revising.

 

For the second and third weeks of class, we will be focusing on polished paragraphs. In preparation for writing, there will be exercises to complete in class and on your own time. For those exercises you complete on your own, please download your 1st Set and 2nd Set worksheets, and type directly into them. Save a copy to your computer so that your work won’t be lost.

 

The handout / schedule for the 2nd Shorter Essay (option one), “This I Believe”, is now available. This assignment is drawn from the public dialogue project at National Public Radio (NPR). Students are encouraged to submit completed essays to NPR. The second option for this essay, “Talk of the Town,” is also drawn from a “real world” writing model: short pieces published in the New Yorker. Sample readings to be discussed in class include E.B. White’s classic “Harriet”, and contemporary talk stories on Burberry babies, bird migration through New York City, and the intoxicating nature of Nigella Lawson. These prompt options are the last of the term to draw from personal material.

 

The handout & schedule for the 3rd Shorter Essay, The Defense”, is now available. This prompt represents a shift in the course; after writing two personal essays, one drawn from a familiar mainstream model, students will spend the remainder of the term on assignments drawn from familiar academic documents. In this essay, students defend the ongoing presence of a single book in the General Studies syllabus. This provides an opportunity to evaluate a text for a particular context and audience, while practicing the conventions of using sources.

 

The 4th Shorter Essay, “The Literature Review”, requires that students put two sources into dialogue about a highly specific topic, while seeking to distinguish their own entry into that dialogue. This is a common task of larger research documents, which must put forth their findings while acknowledging the historical context of an idea and thus the need for their work.

 

The 5th Shorter Essay, “Outsourcing,” asks that students complete a limited research essay while interrogating the research process. Beginning with one of several assigned sources, students must find a second on their own, ensuring that the two sources are compatible and necessary to the essay. This involves research into the source itself, as well as research into a subject.

 

From the beginning of the process for the 6th Shorter Essay, “Field Research”, students will emulate a common academic practice by working with a co-author. In pairs (and one triad), students will write both a detailed prompt and an essay during the course of this assignment, using the conventions and expectations of another discipline to understand what writing looks like in another academic area. Although this essay will be counted as a Shorter Essay in terms of grading, students may find their self-designed prompt requires a lengthier response than is typical.

 

After confining themselves to essays of less than two pages, students will expand an essay to three times its original length (or 4½-6 pages total) for the Longer Essay. Length, of course, is perhaps the easiest task of this essay; more challenging are the tasks of rethinking ideas, transitioning in new directions, and reorganizing and seaming a new essay to make any new material necessary. Although sometimes unsettling, this experience provokes thoughtful reconsideration, revision, and writing, while guarding against empty writing.

 

Associated with this essay is a colloquium in which student pairs lead their classmates in a writing exercise intended to aid expansion and revision. You and a partner (of your choice) will be in charge of class for about 15 minutes. How you use the time is up to you, provided you accomplish the following tasks:

1. Lead the class in a revision and expansion exercise (this includes giving instructions, allowing students time to accomplish enough of the exercise to understand and repeat it on their own, and taking questions and comments as needed).

2. Show how your exercise is, if not directly applicable to every essay assignment, clearly useful for some academic writing assignments.

Sign-up will happen in class on Thursday, 29 October – you must have a partner, lesson title, and clear idea in order to sign up. Titles and ideas (if specific) may be reserved any time prior to that date by emailing the instructor. Colloquia will begin Thursday, 5 November; there will be either five pairings and one triad (with the triad up first) OR six groups of two (with one student up twice for an averaged grade) – the class will choose. You may revise your writing exercise and homework assignment (if any) until Tuesday, 3 November. Please email instructions to your instructor by that deadline so your classmates can prepare.

 

 

 The 7th Shorter Essay, “The Critique”, gives students an opportunity to turn the tables. Especially at this point in the term, it can be useful to put a textbook under a microscope. By looking at the writing of a short selection, students may see how their text is teaching them – or perhaps failing to communicate.

 

The 8th Shorter Essay is a Revision. Students will return to an essay they wrote earlier in the term, and rewrite it for both a revised and new grade. In order to justify a revised grade, students must carefully distinguish how a revision differs from either simply proofreading an essay or writing a wholly new essay.

 

The term’s biggest project, encompassing an essay and colloquium, has begun. Although the eventual essay topic is largely open, students chose one text each from a list to use as a springboard for the essay and topic for the colloquium. Following is a tentative schedule of readings (available through the Penrose website):

 

15 October: Talbot, “Brain Gain”, New Yorker, 27 April 2009 (Liz)

19 October: Boo, “Expectations”, New Yorker, 15 January 2007 (David)

20 October: Koltowitz, “Our Town”, New York Times Magazine, 5 August 2007 (Dave)

22 October: Lowenstein, “The Immigration Equation”, New York Times Magazine, 9 July 2006 (Drew)

26 October: Chapman, “God or Gorilla”, Harper’s, February 2006 (Julianne)

27 October: Anderson, “The Taliban’s Opium War”, New Yorker, 9 July 2007 (Peter)

29 October: Armstrong and Crage, “Movements and Memory”, American Sociological Review, October 2006 (Keli)

2 November: Fish, “Chickens”, Chronicle of Higher Education, 13 May 2005, AND “Academic Cross-Dressing”, Harper’s, December 2005 (Quam)

3 November: Specter, “Big Foot”, New Yorker, 25 February 2008­­ (Nick)

12 November: Pollan, “Unhappy Meals”, New York Times Magazine, 28 January 2007 (Sally)

16 November: Gawande, “The Checklist”, New Yorker, 10 December 2007 (Sydney)

 

 

 

 

 

About your instructor

 

 

Visit Purdue University’s Online Writing Lab.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jenna Terry * 316 Library * 527-5998 * terryj@whitman.edu